 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
One day I hope to do that tour. I am sure the building will still be there at any rate, after all, it survived the London Blitz.
*Update 08/06/2016*
Please note that the opinions in this update are strictly my own.
I visited the Cathedral in June 2016 and paid up my £16 for the experience of seeing the interior of the cathedral and it is truly magnificent, photographs will not go anywhere near doing it justice. It is huge, the amount of artwork and sculptures in it is staggering, and the lofty heights of the dome seem to reach into the stars. It is a stunning building, however, I did not find it a friendly building, if anything I felt as if I was intruding on some much greater work and was not really worthy of being in there. The crypt was out of this world, but it felt cold and clinical, almost too perfect. This seemed more like a space where you crept silently along clutching your hat with eyes downcast. The tombs inside it are awe inspiring, but I found it hard to reconcile some of the words I read on some of the tombs with the history of those buried there. It was really the sort of building where you could spend a whole day and come away feeling drained and I do not want to know how you would feel if you attended a service there. I did find the staff somewhat abrupt, especially the woman in the whispering gallery and again I felt as if I was intruding in a personal empire of the staff. I did not stick around very long, although it started bucketing down shortly after I went inside.
I have visited quite a few cathedrals since I first saw St Paul’s, and they felt just that much more comfortable and accessible. I did not feel the same way in St Paul’s. Sir Christopher Wren created a fantastic building, and I wonder what he would have said had he seen it today. Make no mistake, it is probably the most stunning Cathedral I have ever seen, but it will never be my favourite.
© DRW 2013-2017. Created 13/09/2016. Images recreated 26/03/2016, updated 10/06/2016